I think this topic deserves its own thread and I thank Soudes for bringing this up. There are programs out there that don't have enough common courtesy to send their rejectees a notification--electronic or paper--of the fact that eventhough they are a great applicant, we're not going to offer you an interview. I ask plainly: Is that so hard? Is it going to break the departmental budget? I doubt it.
Program directors and chairman perhaps aren't aware that rejects aren't being sent out. Or maybe they are. I would hope the former. Now does it mean your program is bad because you don't send out rejection notices? Probably not, but just consider that applicants take notice and exception and are likely to share that bit of information when an MS3 asks you what you think about X program. The bottom line is that it's just not that hard to do it and the benefits far outweigh the negatives of not doing it.
On a specific note, the following programs didn't have the courtesy to tell me I wasn't welcome there: UMDNJ, Iowa, San Francisco community program, and UCSF. I hope theses programs decide to do the right thing and extend some courtesy to their applicants in the future.
Program directors and chairman perhaps aren't aware that rejects aren't being sent out. Or maybe they are. I would hope the former. Now does it mean your program is bad because you don't send out rejection notices? Probably not, but just consider that applicants take notice and exception and are likely to share that bit of information when an MS3 asks you what you think about X program. The bottom line is that it's just not that hard to do it and the benefits far outweigh the negatives of not doing it.
On a specific note, the following programs didn't have the courtesy to tell me I wasn't welcome there: UMDNJ, Iowa, San Francisco community program, and UCSF. I hope theses programs decide to do the right thing and extend some courtesy to their applicants in the future.