The latency issue between message generation and delivery to ERAS has been discussed earlier.
As a case study, take the WashU invitations today:
04:09 - message generation timestamp.
12:25 - first post on Orthogate.
13:50 - my ERAS inbox delivery receipt.
To some this might seem petty, but the latency can and has on a few occasions barred me from receiving my first choice interview date, for which I would argue that it's a legitimate matter to raise with the AAMC administration.
It is possible that the batch release from the interviewing school is causing the delay (ie applicants are sent messages in a tiered fashion), but I don't entirely buy into that.
I like pursuing this idea of challenging ERAS because I think that we as students have this application process in place that persists annually without our input as to how it's structured or functions. Do the AAMC med student reps have anything to say on the matter? Anyone, anyone..
As a case study, take the WashU invitations today:
04:09 - message generation timestamp.
12:25 - first post on Orthogate.
13:50 - my ERAS inbox delivery receipt.
To some this might seem petty, but the latency can and has on a few occasions barred me from receiving my first choice interview date, for which I would argue that it's a legitimate matter to raise with the AAMC administration.
It is possible that the batch release from the interviewing school is causing the delay (ie applicants are sent messages in a tiered fashion), but I don't entirely buy into that.
I like pursuing this idea of challenging ERAS because I think that we as students have this application process in place that persists annually without our input as to how it's structured or functions. Do the AAMC med student reps have anything to say on the matter? Anyone, anyone..