The Gateway to Your Orthopaedic Career.

Orthopedic Gateway for Orthopedic Professionals

Orthopaedic surgery news, reviews, forums, videos, educational resources
  Monday, 07 September 2009
  3 Replies
  7 Visits
0
Votes
Undo
It seems that everyone is hypervigilant about ghost publications and cv padding. During my MS1 year, I did some research that really didn't go anywhere and was abandoned bc of inconclusive findings. Do people tend to include these sorts of things?

I have two pretty decent research experiences and two projects that didn't get very far... not sure if PD's look more at quality or quantity, but I don't want to stand out because I 'only had two research projects'.
16 years ago
·
#55106
0
Votes
Undo
It sucks that the projects didn't work, but that's research sometimes.

However, the question of whether or not to include it is something else entirely. Do you want the programs to know about them? Do you think they make your application better? If so, add them.

I've had a couple ortho related projects that didn't get published. One I did for a summer and wasn't all that exciting, so I left it off. The other I worked on for a year and was a pretty interesting topic even if it didn't work, so I included a small blurb on it under research experiences.
16 years ago
·
#55107
0
Votes
Undo
The ERAS has two separate categories for this: One is for research, lsited under experiences, while the second is for publications as a separate section of the application. If you did the research, then list it as a work or volunteer experience, regardless of whether the results were published.
  • Page :
  • 1
There are no replies made for this post yet.