I honestly overlooked the fact that they weren't lined up with names/programs. The way it is in the spreadsheet is anonymous. My bad. I can see how these stats are useful , I misunderstood.
I want to emphasize, though, that I personally know an applicant with <220 who matched (not home program, not a rotator) and another who interviewed at > 15 and didn't match. So, you need to be competitive but there are other subjective intangibles that also play an important role. My point is, work your butt off to kill boards, third year, aways but also don't be discouraged if you don't have a perfect application.