No, I don't have to agree with that, because if everyone knew what good scores were, we wouldn't have a bunch of questions like, "I got a 241, is that good?" as you said. Some people get bad information, like there's no way you can match with a 220, or there's no way you can match without >240, or there's no way you can match without publications. I had a guy at my med school orientation say in a panel discussion that if you want to do Ortho, don't even try unless you have a publication. This is complete bull shit- but I didn't know that at the time and got all worried. We're medical students...that's what we do. We overanalyze. We worry. We bicker and complain. Sad but true.
Don't misinterpret my earlier post or this one. I totally agree with you on most accounts, as I previously stated. Some people post like that just to blow their own horn, and when they do, usually the entire site, myself included, jumps on them. But some people genuinely don't know because they've heard stories and legends told by people who don't really have a clue what they're talking about. That's why they come here...to talk with people who are actually going through the process.
In the end, the whole process is imperfect and doesn't let programs see what they really need to see. On that point, I totally agree with you. That being said, I don't see many ways to significantly change it. You can't rotate everywhere. You can't test ortho knowledge, because most of us aren't taught much Ortho, with the slant of our education to primary care. You can't test someone's visual-spatial skills adequately. Oh well...
How hard am I working today? Two posts within the hour should tell the tale. Fourth year rules...